Quota unquota?

I haven’t been getting too excited about government’s announcement last week that quotas are to be scrapped.

The pessimist in me says that Makhenkesi Stofile’s announcement was simply a way to make the sports portfolio committee look good. A good piece of well timed propoganda.

Quotas are only really a problem in rugby. The cricketers are far better behaved and went to the World Cup with the required number of coloured and black players. They seem to have no problem with Ashwell Prince putting their spectators to sleep and, predictably, came home without the World Cup.

The ‘Q’ word has always sugarcoated or whispered in hushed tones in rugby circles.

Trying to find out an official quota set for Super 14 teams has been impossible in recent times. ‘Targets’, ‘goals’ and other terms are bandied about to hide the truth. Quotas are a hot topic and making it a black and white (excuse the pun) law can only lead to trouble.

So when Makhenkesi Stofile and his sports portfolio committee cashed in on the warm and fuzzy sentiment created by the World Cup win to announce that quotas were out there were little alarm bells ringing in my head.

Big Mak

You see Mak’s brother Mike Stofile is leading a renegade movement in South African rugby circles. The deputy president of Saru is considering a take over movement to overthrow Oregan Hoskins and once in charge he will be able to do as he pleases with the president’s council behind him. Cheeky Watson’s elevation to the president’s council adds further weight to the notion of the “third force” within Saru.

When you consider that a major change is afoot for the way the national team is selected - no longer will the coach or selectors have the authority over selection, but rather the president’s council will have the final say - and you have enough smoke to have the prophets of doom predicting a major fire.

The big question remains as to whether quotas were scrapped as a failed experiment or whether they were simply deemed unnecessary by a force that knows that they will be able to do what and how they please in the near future.

I hope the pessimist in me is wrong and that goverment and the president’s council are going to concentrate their efforts on development rather than window dressing the Springbok team with the likes of Luke Watson.

These icons link to social bookmarking sites where readers can share and discover new web pages.
  • del.icio.us
  • digg
  • Furl
  • muti
  • Reddit
  • YahooMyWeb

3 Responses to “Quota unquota?” »»

  1. Comment by barter | 11/15/07 at 11:41 am

    Nice piece gareth…what i would really like to know is what qualifies these guys to be on this council in the first place?

    And why doesn’t SA Rugby look for someone like, say the head of the UK Premier League soccer, to come down and commericalise rugby in the same way that he did soccer? In other words, a specialised professional

  2. Comment by youliedtometappa | 11/15/07 at 12:07 pm

    Phew. Rosslee you hitting quite hard at the government there. Wouldn’t be surprised if you get a call from Breybuck yourself!

  3. Comment by fatboy | 11/18/07 at 12:56 pm

    hmmm….stofile?, presidents council…i think they have passed there sell by dates..enuff of these people and there hidden agenda’s…….like the irb , they should be replaced by young vibrant proffesionals who know how to lead this game called rugby, the francios pienaars, henie le roux’s, nick farr jones, john eales, fitzpatrcik, brooke etc etc…guys that have playe this game as proffesionals, and are good business minded men….same on the local frnot, get people involved that want sarugby to go forward for rugby’s sake..not personal gain…

Leave a Reply »»