The world’s greatest rugby nation

Sportingo - James Mortimer (06/06/2008)

As the Southern Hemisphere international season commences, many - including some Kiwis - gloat about and mock the New Zealanders’ demise. How uninformed they are.

‘… let’s get this hollow commercial concept of World Cups out of the way. The only real tournament was played in 1987 – which the All Blacks won with a path of domination that was astounding’Canterbury have completed the 2008 Rebel Sport Super 14 with their seventh title in the 13 years that the tournament has been operating. This means quite simply that the world’s dominant provincial team has won over 50 per cent of the toughest domestic international series - a tournament that ranks alongside the Heineken Cup.

If you add the three titles that the Auckland Blues have claimed, this makes for fearsome reading for Australian and South African supporters. Only three times has another country claimed the title. The current world champions, South Africa, for all of their bleating, have won only one title despite empty claims that they have the toughest domestic competition. As well as this, New Zealand has five times provided the losing finalist to the competition’s Grand Final. Fifteen finals appearances to seven by Australia, while the Africans have only appeared in three finals!

But, of course, many point to the fact that countries’ overall domination is reflected in their international performance – and in this arena the All Blacks quite simply have no peer.

First, let’s get this hollow commercial concept of World Cups out of the way. The only real tournament was played in 1987 – which the All Blacks won with a path of domination that was astounding not only for the fact that they were unchallenged, but that they had recently had a massive number of their players banned over the “Cavalier” controversy.

In 1991, the All Blacks did the rugby world a favour by appointing two conflicting coaches and fielding a side on the decline. The Wallabies, eventual champions, nearly lost to Samoa in pool stages and only defeated Ireland by one point. The Australians at this point had evolved into a top team courtesy of being groomed by New Zealand by numerous Bledisloe thrashings.

In 1995, the All Blacks were the dominant team in the cup – hosted by South Africa, whose re-entry into top rugby was due to the New Zealanders’ consistent attempts to play African teams despite their worldwide sporting ban. The Springboks then repaid this favour by poisoning the entire All Blacks team, but despite this could only defeat the legendary team in extra time.

The following three tournaments New Zealand paid the price with poor selection policies, inconsistent game plans and over-hyped expectation. The victories by Australia, England and South Africa in the cups were by name only. John Eales, Martin Johnson and John Smit have all admitted publicly that their teams were given huge favours by having the All Blacks knocked out by once-in-a-lifetime performances by other teams.

South Africa and Australia owe their standing on the world rugby stage to the constant competition with the New Zealanders. The South Africans claim dominance in the amateur days of international rugby, but the controversy over apartheid, biased referees and constant cheating assured South Africa were a false world power. Despite this, New Zealand continued to send teams, despite fears of even being banned from Olympic events and they openly defied the Gleneagles agreement – the only country to do so. Ironically, the All Blacks continued to nurture the South African rugby beast.

Australia gained much from being the Tasman neighbour of New Zealand. Up until 1997 the Wallabies had only won seven Bledisloe Cups and the All Blacks held it for 27 straight years in the mid 1900s – however, the Australians grew from regular competition with the greatest of rugby nations.

But, of course, like any great argument, we need proof to back up these audacious claims. In over 100 years of rugby the All Blacks have only lost 96 times. Every other country in the world has lost at least twice that many games. South Africa have lost more, despite being banned from international competition for many years. New Zealand are the only team in world rugby not to have a half-century of points posted against them and their largest losing margin is 21 points – half of any other team.

To read the rest, click here

These icons link to social bookmarking sites where readers can share and discover new web pages.
  • del.icio.us
  • digg
  • Furl
  • muti
  • Reddit
  • YahooMyWeb

4 Responses to “The world’s greatest rugby nation” »»

  1. Comment by Anonymous | 08/28/08 at 8:09 pm

    Mr Mortimer

    This is exactly why NZ failed at world cups for the last 20 years: your arrogance!

  2. Comment by Anonymous | 08/31/08 at 8:37 am

    Interesting you should use this to try and gain sympathy from the South Africans, especially considering New Zealand was a member of the Commonwealth that UNANIMOUSLY excluded the Springboks from international competitions in the Gleneagles Agreement. New Zealand then invited the Springboks to tour their country in 1981 and they were welcomed by protestors swearing and spitting on them. This in itself was an example of extreme racism by New Zealanders considering the Springboks were NOT the SA government of the day, but merely a sport team eager to measure themselves against their toughest opponents. Hypocrisy to match apartheid!

    As if that was not enough, New Zealanders then proceeded to throw flour bombs at them from an airplane - a pathetic and childish act that reeked of playground bullying tactics and something the New Zealanders should be ashamed of. Instead here you are trying to score brownie points with selective history of that time…

    You talk about the South Africans having short memories? Be careful how you measure others, as you might well come to be measured by the same yardstick…

    Furthermore, the heading you should be writing about is “World Cups - where the All Blacks have got it wrong”. Without a doubt and without fail, the All Blacks have gone into every World Cup as the best side in the world, fielding top quality players in ALL positions and as favourites to win the WC. And yet the All Blacks failed in 1991, 1995, 1999, 2003 and 2007. In your own words - “Is a pattern becoming clear?”

    On returning to Auckland at the end of October last year I saw a month old poster at the entrance of a big hardware chain store which was advertising tickets for an exclusive early morning breakfast at a popular sports pub in Auckland. Included was a full steak-and-egg breakfast, one free beer, the company of some former greats of the game and a special big screen LIVE transmission of the World Cup Semi Final between the All Blacks and Australia..!! I had to read it a second time to confirm as I could not believe my eyes! A little premature, don’t you think?

    Actions like this, articles like these and opinions like yours - and the majority of bloggers on the sport websites in New Zealand - are the reasons the rest of the world view New Zealanders as arrogant and undignified in defeat.

    That is the reason why New Zealand has failed at WC’s - because of their arrogance, their refusal to accept that supreme quality rugby players and teams exist elsewhere in the world as well and that the All Blacks are NOT unbeatable. It also requires a solid mental approach and commitment on the day to attain the spoils.

    New Zealand will continue to lose at the World Cup until they are willing and able to get their mental approach and commitment right on the day, as there might not always be just a BIGGER fish, but also a smaller one with superior motivation…

  3. Comment by Anonymous | 10/10/08 at 5:45 am

    what ever

  4. Comment by Anonymous | 10/10/08 at 5:46 am

    9x

Leave a Reply »»